今日药学

2015, v.25(03) 205-209

[打印本页] [关闭]
本期目录(Current Issue) | 过刊浏览(Archive) | 高级检索(Advanced Search)

莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星序贯治疗社区获得性肺炎的药物经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation Based on Moxifloxacin and Levofloxacin in Sequential IV / PO Treatment of Community-Acquired-Pneumonia

罗群英,甘炜坚,余靖华,刘泳珊
LUO Qunying,GAN Wei Jian,YU Jinghua,LIU Yongshan

摘要(Abstract):

目的对莫西沙星、左氧氟沙星静脉口服序贯方法治疗住院患者治疗社区获得性肺炎进行经济学评价,选择更有经济学价值的治疗方案。方法应用成本效果法对莫西沙星和左氧氟沙星关于序贯疗法治疗社区获得性肺炎进行分析。对符合纳入标准文献(共入选9篇文献)进行统计分析,以临床治疗有效率、细菌清除率作为疗效指标进行药物经济学评价。结果以临床治疗有效率为疗效指标时,莫西沙星的成本较高,疗效较差。以细菌清除率作疗效指标时,选用最小成本法分析,莫西沙星的治疗成本为2 458.97元,左氧氟沙星的治疗成本为1 697.75元,左氧氟沙星的治疗成本较低。结论在序贯治疗法治疗社区获得性肺炎方面上,从临床治疗有效率和细菌清除率的疗效治疗评价,左氧氟沙星的经济价值都比莫西沙星高。
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the pharmacoeconomic effect of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in the sequential IV / PO treatment of community-acquired-pneumonia( CAP),so as to choose the treatment programs with higher economic value. METHODS Cost effective method of moxifloxacin and levofloxacin in Sequential IV / PO treatment of CAP were analyzed. The clinical effectiveness and bacterial clearance rates were collected from the inclusion criteria literature( a total of 9 selected literature) by statistical analysis.RESULTS When the clinical effective rate was used as therapeutic effect index,the effect of moxifloxacin was worse and the cost was higher. When the bacterial clearance rate was used as therapeutic effect index,the cost of moxifloxacin was 2 458. 97 yuan and that of levofloxacin was 1 697. 75 yuan. CONCLUSION For the sequential IV / PO treatment of CAP,when the clinical effective rate and bacterial clearance rate were used as therapeutic effect index,the economic value of levofloxacin is better than moxifloxacin.

关键词(KeyWords): 莫西沙星;左氧氟沙星;社区获得性肺炎;经济学评价
moxiflaxacin;levofloxacin;community-acquired pneumonia;pharmacoeconomic evaluation

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation):

作者(Author): 罗群英,甘炜坚,余靖华,刘泳珊
LUO Qunying,GAN Wei Jian,YU Jinghua,LIU Yongshan

参考文献(References):

扩展功能
本文信息
服务与反馈
本文关键词相关文章
本文作者相关文章
中国知网
分享